Protein footprinting is a powerful technique used to investigate the interactions between proteins and their ligands. Several methods for performing protein footprinting include chemical modification, hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX), infrared spectroscopy, and circular dichroism. Each technique has its strengths and weaknesses, making it essential to select the appropriate method for a given protein-ligand system carefully.
One common technique for protein footprinting is chemical modification. This involves labelling the protein with a reactive group, such as a cleavable photoreactive group, and subjecting it to chemical treatments to determine the protein regions protected or modified by the ligand. Chemical modification can provide high-resolution information about the specific residues involved in ligand binding. Still, alterations are often extensive and require non-native conditions for binding, such as variable pH or exposure to solvents. Immuto’s approach to chemical modification is low-touch and maintains the native environment, resulting in the most relevant biological information.
Another technique is hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX), which involves exchanging the hydrogen atoms in the protein with deuterium atoms and then monitoring the exchange rate to determine the regions of the protein that are protected or modified by the ligand. While HDX is non-covalent, the deuterium naturally back-exchanges with native hydrogen in the protein solution over time. As a result, HDX experiments are typically performed at ultra-low pH and exceedingly cold temperatures and can take hours for a full exchange. Additionally, the non-covalent, back-exchange-prone deuterium labels can result in the experimental data’s lack of reliability and reproducibility, with differences seen day-to-day or even hour-to-hour.
Infrared spectroscopy is another technique for protein footprinting, involving the analysis of the infrared spectrum of the protein after chemical or physical treatments to determine the regions of the protein that are protected or modified by the ligand. However, this approach is very low-resolution, often unable to resolve anything beyond the macromolecular structural changes seen with wholesale modification. Additionally, it involves modification of the protein with crosslinking agents that can perturb native structure.
Circular dichroism is a similar technique involving the analysis of the circular dichroism spectrum of the protein after chemical or physical treatments to determine the regions of the protein that are protected or modified by the ligand. Again, this is a very low-resolution approach, often unable to resolve anything beyond the macromolecular structural changes seen with wholesale modification.
Immuto’s methodology for protein footprinting aims to be all-encompassing, allowing for success in various situations while capturing the most relevant, native-state biological data for downstream development. By maintaining the native environment and minimizing the use of non-native conditions, Immuto’s approach to chemical modification is particularly well-suited for studying protein-ligand interactions in their native state. Additionally, it is highly reproducible and reliable, providing high-quality data that can be used confidently in downstream development efforts.
Selecting the appropriate protein footprinting technique depends on the specific protein-ligand system being studied and the desired resolution and reliability of the data. While each technique discussed here has its strengths and weaknesses, Immuto’s approach to protein footprinting provides a powerful and versatile tool for studying protein-ligand interactions in their native state.